Language And Literature Essay

Analyze, compare and agate line the following two texts. Include comments on the similarities and differences between the texts and the significance of context, purpose, audience, and formal and stylistic features.Cranes by Jennifer Ackerman, and To a water bird by William Cullen Bryant, both(prenominal) aim to enlighten and educate their readers on the behavior and beauty of water bird. textbook 1, Cranes, an article from National Geographic from 2004, demonstrates how people can benefactor birds discover their migration patterns, while in railway line Text 2, To a Waterfowl, a poem written in 1815, illustrates how birds can aid people in the search for inspiration.Ultimately both, Cranes and To a Waterfowl focus on these specific birds with the intention of promoting the appreciation and agreement towards nature. This comparative commentary will aim to identify and investigate the similarities and differences between the two texts, through the depth psychology of the signif icance of the context, audience, purpose, and formal and stylistic features.Cranes, a journalistic article established for National Geographic, searchs the habitation of a community of cranes. The article discusses the operations of the new crane reserve, where the threaten species are monitored during their growth in a simulation of a natural environment, where pieces in crane costumes examine their development. The article further demonstrates its journalistic characteristics when it quotes crane biologist Richard Urbanek, who explains, these chicks have been raised in captivity but have never hear a human voice nor seen a human form, except in crane costume.Fundamentally, the article demonstrates the data-based program to reintroduce a wild migratory population of whooping cranes to the eastern half of North America, and the border involved in r individuallying their goal. In contrast, To a Waterfowl explores the narrators personal fellowship and response to an encounter wit h a waterfowl.The poem demonstrates a narrative, which illustrates a cranes flight and its battle to escape the hunter and its demise, which results in the individual establishing an internal reflection, which ultimately reveals the morality that William Bryant wanted to convey. The didactic poem creates a natural scene in order to derive a moral lesson from it, which I believe, actually romantically, that no matter how circumstances present themselves in life, you will be directed by the frugality of God, or a higher Power.Though fundamentally, Cranes and To a Waterfowl both discuss and explore experiences relating to cranes, they possess different purposes, which essentially results in them possessing different target audiences as well. To a Waterfowls main purpose is to communicate the central moral teaching regarding Gods benevolent providence. The waterfowl acts as an allegory to express this theme within the poem. Referring to the poem allegorically, the waterfowl may repre sent human struggles that we face throughout life, while the birds adversary, the hunter, represents the pursuing threats that we constantly face in life.I believe that the poem is targeted towards a more mature audience due to its thematic complexity and seriousness. In contrast to this, Cranes purpose is to inform and educate the readers on the modern techniques pioneered by Operation Migration, and their mission to help endangered birds learn their traditional migratory routes. Therefore, I believe that this National Geographic articles intended audience are individuals who are interested or concerned about the preservation of endangered animals, and in this example, specifically cranes.A significant difference between the two texts exists in their structures. Cranes is presented as an article, and demonstrates many another(prenominal) of the formats characteristics. Visually, it possesses two images, in order to compliment the text and attract the readers attention to the artic le, and is structured in paragraphs. In terms of context and language, the article demonstrates numerous examples of factual information, support by evidence, rather then expressing opinionated points. For example, referencing crane biologist Richard Urbanek. In contrast to this, To a Waterfowl illustrates numerous examples of standard characteristics of a poem. Bryant divides the poem into eight stanzas, each with the same metrical structure and each with the same rhyme pattern.Although both texts are written in different formants and demonstrate different structures, both texts exemplify the use of descriptive imagery in their use of language in order to conjure up the description the writers are trying to illustrate.For example, in the poem, the writer describes the surroundings by saying, weedy lake, rocking billows, and crimson gear, while in the article Cranes, the first paragraph has examples such as emerald green grass, achromatic plumage and elegant black wing tips that spread like fingers when they fly. Furthermore, in contrast to the article, the poem utilizes allusions towards the Bible, by mentioning heaven, and utilizing biblical language such as thou art gone.Conclusively, both texts, Cranes by Jennifer Ackerman, and To a Waterfowl by William Cullen Bryant demonstrate numerous contrasts in their use of language, purpose, audience and stylistic features, however, both are similar in their aim to communicate the significance of crane migrations, scientifically, and emotionally.